New York City Ballet
“Jewels”: “Emeralds”, “Rubies”, “Diamonds”
Opera House
The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
Washington, DC
April 1, 2014
by George Jackson
copyright 2014 by George Jackson
Abi Stafford and Jared Angle in George Balanchine's Emeralds from Jewels. Photo credit: Paul Kolnik.
Over time, different facets of George Balanchine’s three “Jewels” ballets have caught the eye. Sometimes the sense of national character – French, American, Russian - has seemed prime. Or it has been the spirit of the musical styles – the lush yet light pre-impressionism of Faure’s compositions, the terse and tangy modern tone of Stravinsky’s capriccio, the courtly classic romance of Tschaikovsky’s sound (from his third symphony). Personalities have dominated on occasion, the individuality of the leading dancers, their temperaments and interactions – particularly those of the premiere cast forty-seven years ago this month. Paramount for me in this latest “Jewels” was the distinct sense of time in each of the three works. Time present – the action as it happens – impresses us in all three pieces, of course. In “Emeralds”, though, there is also recall. Some of the dancers seem to be remembering times past or they anticipate, they seem to listen for what will come in the future. Time present passes slowly, softly in “Emeralds” but in “Rubies” it traverses at a jaunty pace. “Rubies” is about the moment, about now. Inherent in “Diamonds” is a sense of timelessness. That catchy phrase, “diamonds are forever”, comes to mind unbidden as we watch a stately pair negotiate its union and consent to ruling a country, a ranked populace, people. Despite the patent imagery, there were problems with this performance of “Jewels” that opened NYC Ballet’s 2014 week in Washington.