American Ballet Theater unveiled a new production of John Cranko’s “Onegin” Tuesday that looks surprisingly like the old one. Santo Loquasto’s designs are lighter and more impressionistic than those Jürgen Rose created for the original staging, but they keep to the same time periods of early and mid-nineteenth century. Since the choreography and direction remain as they were in the past, the net effect is that the ballet seems slightly airier but otherwise little changed. This may have been part of the plan, since it does not alter Cranko’s original conception and allows emphasis to remain on the plot and characters. Not that much could detract from Tuesday’s stellar cast, which was led by Marcelo Gomes, Diana Vishneva, Natalia Osipova and Jared Matthews.
American Ballet Theatre Antony Tudor Centennial Celebration New York City Center October 31, 2008
by Gay Morris copyright 2008 by Gay Morris
Antony Tudor is considered one of the great ballet choreographers of the twentieth century, and since his career was closely associated with American Ballet Theatre it is not surprising that ABT would celebrate the centennial of Tudor’s birth, as it did on Friday evening as part of its fall season at City Center. However, Tudor was never easy to place professionally nor easy to deal with personally. Unlike Jerome Robbins, whose long association with New York City was honored by that company last spring, Tudor was not a native son, he did not create a large body of choreography, and he only worked intermittently with ABT. In short, although the company has always claimed Tudor as its own, he was not totally part of it. The ambiguous nature of this relationship may be one of the reasons why Friday’s celebration did not feel altogether committed, showing only sporadic evidence of thought or love.
According to published accounts, Peter Martins
seriously considered whether the world needed another “Romeo and
Juliet” before embarking on a production for New York City Ballet. The
world probably does not need another ”Romeo and Juliet” ballet, there
are already more than enough, but at least Martins’ production has many
good things in it. The company premiered the work Tuesday evening as
the main feature of its glamorous spring gala, this year made even more
glamorous by the presence of President Bill Clinton in the audience.
Martins dedicated the evening to Lincoln Kirstein as part of the New
York City Ballet founder’s centenary celebrations. It was probably more
a convenience than a conscious effort to create a work in Kirstein’s
honor since it is hard to imagine Kirstein being interested in a “Romeo
and Juliet” that was transposed fairly literally from play to ballet.
Kirstein was more concerned with advanced art works than with
traditional ones.